July 22, 2011
IO Group v. Does-244: what to expect
Three new documents were filed with the court yesterday. 1. Court clerk entered default of two defendants who failed to response to the amended complaint in 21 days. Although I…
Three new documents were filed with the court yesterday. 1. Court clerk entered default of two defendants who failed to response to the amended complaint in 21 days. Although I…
IO Group v. Does 1-34 was dismissed on 7/13/11 11 defendants were dismissed earlier from this case with prejudice, which indicates settlement rate of 30% or $20,000 in ransom cash….
IO Group v. Does 1-244. Today (4 days past the deadline) Sperlein filed proof of service to 2 defendants: MARIUSZ PRALAT (Doe # 1) MALGORZATA FRACZYK (Doe #36) He voluntarily…
“About” page has been updated, so new visitors would get up to speed in understanding of the issue. I described who copyright trolls are and why their “business” is immoral…
Most likely you’ve already noticed that Sperlein has voluntarily dismissed one of IO Group’s cases, IO Group v. Anthony Uy: I don’t have any additional information. No new entries on…
Various sources suggest that some extortion victims received more than one threatening letter after ISPs cough up their identities. Is it so? I wonder why some are targeted more aggressively…
Monkey trap (plural monkey traps) (literally, probably folk-lore) A cage containing a banana with a hole large enough for a monkey’s hand to fit in, but not large enough for…
There is an interesting development in IO Group v. Does 1-50 Inclusive case. David Salery is one of the few defendants who are actively fighting: he filed the Motion to…
This blog has reached 10,000th page hit yesterday. Thank you for reading, commenting and contributing. Many victims of the extortion scheme considered paying ransoms. I hope that at least some…
The Answer to the First Amended Complaint in our case (IO Group v. Does 1-244) was filed by Sthephen Thomas on behalf of defendant Chun Rong Zheng (Doe # 26)…