IO Group v. Does 1-244.

Today (4 days past the deadline) Sperlein filed proof of service to 2 defendants:

• MARIUSZ PRALAT (Doe # 1)
• MALGORZATA FRACZYK (Doe #36)

He voluntarily dismissed 5 defendants

With prejudice (cannot sue based on the same complaint):

• ZHI NENG WU (Doe #29)
• HAO XU (Doe # 33)

Without prejudice (can sue later based on the same complaint):

• CAROL B. PEAL (Doe #27)
• RUBEN MORENO (Doe #31)
• SANG YEOL KIM (Doe #35)

Also he requested to enter default against

• MARIUSZ PRALAT (Doe #1) – suspicious complaint discrepancy
• MALGORZATA FRACZYK (Doe #36)

Which leaves one defendant in undetermined state:

• CHUN RONG ZHENG (Doe #26) – this defendant had just filed very good response

I presume that this defendant is implicitly dismissed since no proof of service was filed.