IO Group v. Does 1-244 case, which I have been a part of, is effectively over. Today federal judge William Alsup ruled in plaintiff’s favor and entered the final default…
Three new documents were filed with the court yesterday. 1. Court clerk entered default of two defendants who failed to response to the amended complaint in 21 days. Although I…
IO Group v. Does 1-244. Today (4 days past the deadline) Sperlein filed proof of service to 2 defendants: MARIUSZ PRALAT (Doe # 1) MALGORZATA FRACZYK (Doe #36) He voluntarily…
The Answer to the First Amended Complaint in our case (IO Group v. Does 1-244) was filed by Sthephen Thomas on behalf of defendant Chun Rong Zheng (Doe # 26)…
In his amended complaint (IO Group v. Does 1-244), Mr. Sperlein describes his client’s gay pornography flick: 22. The movie Breakers is of obvious high production values and is easily…
Today judge Alsup issued an order: Previously, the following events were scheduled: All defendants must be served with the summons and complaint and proof of service on all defendants…
In his amended complaint (IO Group v. Does 1-244) Mr. Sperlein lists 5 causes of action: Copyright Infringement 17 U.S.C. §501 Contributory Copyright Infringement Vicarious Copyright Infringement Civil Conspiracy Negligence…
I filed my Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike on 4/11/11. IO Group’s council then provided his Reply to Opposition on 4/15/11. Let’s read the following paragraph on page 2…
Doe #151 was not listed in the original complaint : see page 26: … 164. Defendant Doe 150, without authorization, reproduced Plaintiff’s registered work OverDrive (U.S. registration No. PA 1-660-158)…
I started re-reading IO Group v. Does 1-244 court filings in order to document numerous deceptions by IO Group’s council, Mr. Sperlein. To my astonishment, I immediately discovered a major…
