Prenda
Prenda’s local Jacques Nazaire: Judge Wright’s order is irrelevant because… Anonymous attacked PayPal
Nazaire met (and somewhat exceeded) expectation this time: in his yet another attempt (in the AF Holdings, LLC v. Patel, GAND 12-cv-00262) to shield the judge from the damning truth — that Prenda, according to Judge Wright, is a bunch of fraudsters, tax evaders and identity thieves.
10. The undersigned does not know the answer to that question. However, it must be noted that defendants (not the one herein) in these types of cases, typically employ various crafty and intimidating schemes against prosecutors and plaintiff’s attorneys. A newspaper article mentioning other types of intimidation is attached hereto as Plaintiff’s Exhibit A.
11. Furthermore the undersigned has been personally harassed by these types of defendants (not the defendant in this instant case nor the individuals listed in Exhibit A) because of THIS case alone. (Please see Plaintiff’s Exhibit B attached hereto).
This is intriguing enough to jump to Pacer and download the exhibits. And what do we find?
Exhibit A: a newspaper article about Anonymous performing a DDoS attack on PayPal in 2010… Wow.
Exhibit B: a nasty, yet absolutely irrelevant email:
Well, the Prenda gang members are not new to using nasty emails sent to them for the purpose of moving judges to pity. Only this time the email contained a question, which Nazaire has perfectly answered himself by filing the Exhibit A.
Featured comment
Mysterious Anonymous on May 22, 2013 at 5:06 pm:
Let me get this straight.
He’s trying to argue that the fact that the firm he represents has been found to be defrauding the courts, committing ID theft, and has been catastrophically sanctioned for that behavior via monetary sanctions (that they are currently refusing to comply with) and criminal referrals to the USAO and IRS, is totally irrelevant to the case before the Georgia court.
And to support this argument (that the so-called irrelevant documents should not be filed), he files a couple of documents that, by his own admission, are totally irrelevant?
Now we know why this guy has to work for Prenda.
Update
5/24/2013
Defendant, through Blair Chintella, replied to Nazaire’s bizarre pleading. Translation from Legalese:
Exhibits A & B: WTF??
Also, Chintella tweeted that the sanction motion hearing is set to June 20, 2013.
Coverage
- TechDirt: Prenda Lawyer Says Georgia Court Should Ignore Judge Wright’s Order Because… Look! Hackers! by Mike Masnick.
Fight © Trolls 
The “Evilpiratemonkey’ was soooooooo crafty. Maybe he is cousin to the Evil Hate Monkey (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si0DcLvdyJw). Sad little Troll.
DTD 🙂
I’ve seen Trixie LIttle & Evil Hate Monkey perform. They have some talent 😉
You owe me 4:18 of my life back.
Nobody makes lawyerling look like hard work quite as well as a shitty ass lawyer.
Nazaire makes it look HAAAAAARRRRRDDDDD
Let me get this straight.
He’s trying to argue that the fact that the firm he represents has been found to be defrauding the courts, committing ID theft, and has been catastrophically sanctioned for that behavior via monetary sanctions (that they are currently refusing to comply with) and criminal referrals to the USAO and IRS, is totally irrelevant to the case before the Georgia court.
And to support this argument (that the so-called irrelevant documents should not be filed), he files a couple of documents that, by his own admission, are totally irrelevant?
Now we know why this guy has to work for Prenda.
Yes, it’s irrelevant because the word ‘fraud’ might have a completely different meaning in California. We need to look at the details of th…
!!!WOOKIE!!
Have to admit this is one of the Prenda lawsuits I have been trolling because you just knew Nazaire’s response was going to be off the wall, but have to agree with SJD, he did exceed expectations.
The question is: Why is Prenda allowing this very obvious loose cannon to careen around the deck of their sinking ship?
Insanity plea? Or planning to stall for time so XBiz can send off the S.S. Prenda to sail for territories not named the USA?
Fellas! Let’s give the guy a break. Trolling websites that allow you to post anonymously is hard, hard work. Nazaire can’t even get his thoughts together, never mind make a logical argument for the court.
“Allowing this to continue will cause confusion and will lead to unnecessary billing fees. . . .” Um, Pot, meet Kettle.
Everybody needs a good face-palm once in a while.
You are all missing his point. One of the people in the article, or the person who sent the email, might be gay and live in a liberal state like Oregon. It makes perfect sense… to Nazaire… (Note to Nazaire this is sarcasm. Relax. Go read a good book – like The Crown: A Tale of Blood, Women and Wine.)
I’ve heard of the Chewbacca Defense, but is really trying to do a Chewbacca OFFENSE?
This is the guy who advertised on Craigslist, right? Craigslist has also run solicitations from, you know, people who want someone to dress up in a latex Richard Nixon mask and flog them or similar alternative pasttimes. Therefore, under Nazaire’s logic, his arguments must be irrelevant.
Jacques Nazaire’s law school is now reassessing their admissions policy.
*stares at his nym*
could it be I pushed him over the edge?
Blair Chintella (defense attorney on this case) tweeted: