April 14, 2012
Lightspeed Media Corporation v. John Doe: a quick Q & A
This is the first post by a long-time reader (and valuable contributor to the discussions) Raul. I hope he will be back soon to share more of his thoughts in…
This is the first post by a long-time reader (and valuable contributor to the discussions) Raul. I hope he will be back soon to share more of his thoughts in…
Anyone, who follows mass bittorent lawsuits, certainly remembers an amusing event when a judge ordered Prenda Law’s attorney, a copyright troll Brett Gibbs, to present a “list of the BitTorrent…
When I told my story a year ago, I wrote that “the judicial system is not inherently wrong, but it is very slow.” It took a while before judges around…
I recently wrote about how Prenda’s “rogue partner” Brett Gibbs was commanded to list all Prenda’s (and its predecessors’) mass porn bittorent cases and to indicate how many Doe defendants…
Update: Bad news It appears that judge Schumacher vacated the order that caused so much excitement. I apologize for delivering false hopes. At the same time I’m rather angry than…
“Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, our lawsuit against you personally will not commence until we serve you with a Complaint, which we are prepared to do if our…
A reader sent me this funny sound clip. Enjoy! (Mark Lutz is a Prenda Law employee responsible for harassment calls.)
Remember how John Steele was ridiculed by Judge Shadur after his two troll cases in a row were assigned to a judge who once said that this divorce-lawyer-turned-copyright-hound “abused the…
Recently I wrote about judge Gibney ordering a minor troll Wayne O’Bryan to show cause why his mass file-sharing lawsuits are not frivolous and as such, why he shouldn’t be…
As I stated in the FAQ, An outcome of a motion [to quash a subpoena] is uncertain – it is really depends on the judge, and since it costs virtually…