Attorneys who defend troll victims
- Samuel Perkins (Boston MA)
- Edward R. Molari (Boston, MA)
- BoothSweet LLP: Dan Booth and Jason Sweet (Cambridge MA)
- Nicholas Guerrera (North Andover MA)
- Catherine Rajwani (Northborough MA)
- Eric Menhart (Washington DC)
Relevant posts
- Copyright troll victim prevails in the first action against trolls (4/24/2014)
- Prenda’s local attorney Daniel Ruggiero denounces his employers (8/14/2013)
- Alexandra Capachietti of Burson and Levinson LLP is NOT a porno troll (4/6/2013)
- IBM to sue Marvin Cable for trademark infringement (4/1/2013)
- Booth Sweet LLP tells court a story of Prenda’s deception and abuse, asks for a bond to be posted by AF Holdings (2/2/2013)
- How do you call a lovemaking act without a partner? (1/23/2013)
- First powerful defense in Prenda/Guava individual federal case (12/17/2012)
- Judge Leo Sorokin is tired of troll Marvin Cable’s lies, denies ex-parte discovery (11/7/2012)
- A motion that made my day (10/9/2012)
- Another Massachusetts Judge issues a strong anti-extortion Memorandum and Order (10/4/2012)
- Attorney Samuel Perkins: Troll Marvin Cable must be stopped, all the 34 of his cases should be dismissed with prejudice (8/25/2012)
- Another day, another defendant is fighting back (8/20/2012)
- The Fifth Column: Marc Randazza attempts to sabotage defense against copyright trolls (8/6/2012)
- Lightspeed Media v. John Doe: a must-read motion written by a real IP attorney (7/13/2012)
- Do you still think that talking to plaintiff’s lawyer is a good idea? (10/14/2011)
- More light under the bridge (6/10/2011)
Fight © Trolls 
There is an ANSWER to Complaint in case 1:12-cv-10945 but access is denied in pacer. Any ideas what this may be?
Good question. I’m curious! 😀
Its from a doe who’s info got released late and received the scam letter in December, has some PII in there so I’d rather not post. Case was almost over the 120 days when his info was released, now we’re looking at more like 240 on this and other MA cases with no serving. Its really a shame to have such differing actions from judges like Boal vs the lackluster judging going on here. Cable seems to be pretty quiet lately, probably wised up with all the California business going on.
I knew I remembered that logo from somewhere, the punk lifted it from IBM!
” Use of IBM logos
IBM carefully limits the use of its logos. No other company may use IBM logos unless it has the express written permission of IBM, or is licensed by IBM to do so.
To obtain permission to use any IBM logo, contact your IBM representative or the IBM Call Center at 1-800-IBM4YOU (1-800-426-4968) and ask for Corporate Branding. ”
http://www.ibm.com/legal/us/en/copytrade.shtml#section_2
Well shucks, it’d be a real shame if somebody were to have alerted IBM…
Breaking Glass Pictures v. Swarm Sharing Hash File SHA1: A705C88ADACBD6B082C6800BEF09D4653AB6ECF1 et al so a new player on the scene????
Plaintiff: Breaking Glass Pictures
Plaintiff Counsel: Alexandra Capachietti of Burns & Levinson LLP
Defendant: Swarm Sharing Hash File A0AD891DA8DF4D87DDC343A3742DCF610FEE7B6D
Does 1-5
Hash is for direct to DVD B-movie”6 Degrees of Hell” http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2002789/
Alexandra Capachietti is a former assistant DA for Essex county
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/alexandra-capachietti/33/168/609
She needs a warning regarding what she’s getting into with these lawsuits; seems like she’s on the up and up but I’ll give her the benefit of the doubt she isn’t aware of the trolling scourge
Alexandra Capachietti of Burns & Levinson LLP, 1:13-cv-10735 – assigned to Leo “Smackdown” Sorokin
Link to the recap
http://ia801703.us.archive.org/4/items/gov.uscourts.mad.150471/gov.uscourts.mad.150471.docket.html
First paragraph of the complaint I found rather odd:
“Plaintiff is the registered owner of the copyright to a motion picture entitled “6
Degrees of Hell” (hereinafter the “Motion Picture”). THE MOTION PICTURE IS NOT A
PORNOGRAPHIC FILM.”
Trying to distance yourself from the porno trolls Alexandra? Well you’re using all the same terrible tactics and nonexistent evidence. They say if it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck…
Hilarious (and sad). If I have time, I’ll write about it.
91 Does! Why even try at this stage for such joinder?
3/28, Cable’s case that had been recommended for dismissal: MA CV 1:12-10532 was dismissed for failure to serve. Case has been Recapped.
Here’s the link to the Recap:
http://ia601200.us.archive.org/32/items/gov.uscourts.mad.142861/gov.uscourts.mad.142861.docket.html
At one point, there were other cases related to this one. I assume that they were all dismissed also. It’s not clear to me if that is the case.
Associated Cases
Related Cases Start Date End Date
1:12-cv-10756-NMG Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1 – 38 04/30/2012
1:12-cv-10757-DPW Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1 – 33 04/30/2012
1:12-cv-10759-DPW Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1 – 30 04/30/2012
1:12-cv-10758-GAO Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1 – 36 04/30/2012 03/28/2013
Poor Marvin… Some people simply attract trouble…
Anyone have any idea what is going on with Cable’s cases. For instance, in case 1:12-cv-10804, Judge Saylor issued a motion which mentions the following:
For the foregoing reasons, the claims against all of the “Doe” defendants are severed and
all claims, except those against “Doe #1,” are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.
Then Marvin dismisses Doe 1 without prejudice. Could someone explain?
It means that lawsuit is now dead but Cable could always file individual lawsuits against the same Does. However given the repeated benchslaps Cable has received the chances of him refilling are very, very slight.
My teen son received a letter from Marvin cable demanding a 1700 settlement. What should I do???
My teen son received a letter from Marvin cable demanding 1700$. What should I do??
Not an easy thing to answer in a single sentence – or a few paragraphs. I will first assume that you (or the ISP subscriber) got the settlement demand letter/email. What I would first do is make sure your network is secure and there is no BT activity continuing on it. Some Trolls will continue to monitor the IP addresses and use continuing activity to push harder for settlement or increasing settlement demands. I don’t know what Mr. Cable has been up to as far a cases. Make sure you read up on these types of cases, as well as what Mr. Cable has been up to. I don’t think he has been naming and serving individuals with summons/complaint – someone correct me if I’m wrong.
DTD 🙂
He has Mac and said there’s nothing on there. Basically comcast sent an email warning. I called to find out why I violated FCC. Said someone ATTEMPTED to download a “particular” movie. It was a warning etc. I made sure nothing happened again and secured wifi etc. then we get this letter saying our prev deadline is over(didn’t know about a deadline). And now we have one week to pay. I just talked to him and he’s an a&&hole. By going on some paying website they retrieved tons of info on my son. He was vague on the phone when I asked what would he do if I didn’t pay😳👎
You ought to tell SJD (PRIVATELY – not in a comment here) which case this is associated with (it should say on the paperwork) – to see if it’s one where the judge squashed the subpoenas and told MC he better not contact any of the people whose info he got, without refiling against them individually. That has happened , to the best of my knowledge, to most of his cases in MA, and it would be very naughty of him to be disobeying judges orders so blatantly.
Good idea. My email is sophisticatedjanedoe@yahoo.com : Needless to say, I’m being entrusted with a lot of sensitive information, and it would only take one betrayal to ruin the reputation.
Sent email. Thanks
It sounds like you got a CEG Email and you called Marvin Cable to prove your innocence. You gave them your phone number by calling, so they were able to get your name. You need to be clear if you are sued in a current case or you responded to an email. Did you get a subpoena through your ISP? I don’t think Cable is suing many if any nowadays, but calling him was a bad idea.
I’m really surprised this scumbug was not trumped by superior lawpower yet: roaches are survivable…
Call one of the lawyers listed on this page, they are all good and most (if not all) won’t mind talking to you for free.
I hired an attorney
Just my two cents: the last place Cable wants to see is the inside of a federal courthouse. The chances he will actually sue someone are almost nonexistent.
The top rated, finest Android Games are solely listed here,
all of the video games are tested by Android specialists.
Gain respect to race towards bosses.