Guava federal Cases: IP addresses

This table complements the following post: Long overdue update on Guava v. Skyler Case (Prenda’s Cook County lawsuit).

IP Address City State ISP
173.26.146.237 Gulf Breeze FL Mediacom Communications Corp.
205.178.93.33 Chicago IL RCN Corporation
205.178.93.62 Chicago IL RCN Corporation
207.38.253.29 Astoria NY RCN Corporation
208.103.73.236 New London CT Metrocast Communications
208.103.75.18 New London CT Metrocast Communications
209.6.50.65 Somerrville MA RCN Corporation
209.6.72.13 Brighton MA RCN Corporation
216.15.16.92 Washington DC RCN Corporation
216.80.26.142 Chicago IL RCN Corporation
24.192.37.166 Deaborn MI WideOpenWest
50.83.163.42 Springfield MO Mediacom Communications Corp.
65.60.170.220 Reynoldsburg OH WideOpenWest
69.47.211.78 Elgin IL WideOpenWest
70.162.31.215 Chandler AZ Cox Communicaitns
72.210.67.50 Warner Robins GA Cox Communications
74.199.46.178 Glenview IL WideOpenWest
98.180.29.4 Gainesville FL Cox Communications
71.92.65.184 Monterey Park CA Charter Communications
173.26.146.237 Gulf Breeze FL Mediacom Communications Corp.
66.44.41.180 Washington DC RCN Corporation
66.189.69.147 Chicopee MA Charter Communications
24.183.22.213 Chippewa Falls Wi Charter Communications
68.188.228.66 Alpena MI Charter Communications
75.139.188.21 Walla Walla WA Charter Communications
68.191.43.242 Southbury CT Charter Communications
68.189.20.187 Sacramento CA Charter Communications
96.38.172.28 Saun Valley NV Charter Communications
68.186.96.212 West Richland WA Charter Communications
66.190.229.129 Klamath Falls OR Charter Communications
173.25.126.109 Toney AL Mediacom Communications Corp.
97.88.160.74 St. Louis MO Charter Communications
173.25.126.109 Toney AL Mediacom Communications Corp.
75.132.145.95 Belleville IL Charter Communications
Comments
    • Anonymous says:

      If you don’t mind could you please tell me where you found this list? I received a letter re: a subpoena from my IPS. My IP address is similar to one listed here but the decimal point is off by one space and it is listed in the wrong state. I want to confirm this info so I can determine if I should still be on the look out for an extortion letter. Thank you.

      • SJD says:

        The article, which this list complements, has links to the dockets for each state (closer to the bottom the bottom): some exhibits list all the IP addresses, not every docket is recapped though. I copied them from one, don’t remember which. Let me know if you find any of my errors or discrepancies between the states, it would be interesting.

      • That Anonymous Dude says:

        To which case did it refer? The Cook County (Guava v. Case) or one of the Doe cases where I’m not sure who the hell the actual “Doe” is if there are five IPs but only one Doe…and those five IPs are located between California and Florida. Oh, and Prenda doesn’t care about “close to your IP” they don’t care if it’s not your IP they don’t care if you’re deaf, blind, dumb, in a wheelchair, in a nursing home, or in the ground six feet under. I’ll pull dockets again (I’m the one who originally did this, well, most of them…I think), but that was before additional suits were filed. I pulled the ILND, MIED, MAD, CAND (I think), DCD, and GAND (was it Northern? eh I dunno)…and OHND but that was chucked sua sponte when the judge used geolocation to determine that the IP wasn’t in the district (funny as hell actually, using the trolls’ own tactics against them), not sure if dumbass refiled or not I’ll look into that in about 10 min. I know Duffy hasn’t touched the DCD one since Howell denied ex parte because she wanted an expert declaration back in October (no “expert” would file a declaration apparently) and the ex parte request in ILND hasn’t been granted yet but a Doe has already settled. Anyway I’ll look into it and verify the list’s accuracy.

  1. Anonymous says:

    wow, I reviewed two separate court documents (only two had the list) and they both show the same IP address (not mine, the decimal is in the wrong space otherwise identicle). I don’t know how many other people have had this same thing happen. You might want to recommend Charter plaintiffs to double check their IPs

  2. No name says:

    A little confused here. If a person’s IP is on this list, what does that mean?

  3. That Anonymous Dude says:

    You can add a new IP to the list, 208.58.113.138. Named defendant in PAED case (12-cv-06724) just filed by Ruggiero on 12/3. Talk about weird. Ruggiero’s complaint doesn’t mention defendant’s name, only refers to him by IP but docket has his name in capital letters (for emphasis he’s being sued, or a court thing). IP geolocates to Upper Darby, PA and ISP is RCN.

    • Anonymous says:

      As one that has one of the mentioned IPs and have been served a summon by a court from a different state, What is the next step I should take?

      This is the first time this has happened to me and I’m not sure how to handle this. I’ve already contacted a lawyer for his advice.

      Any advice from you guys would be greatly appreciated.

      Thanks

      • Raul says:

        Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and Rule 11 sanctions IMO.

        • Anonymous says:

          Sorry I assumed the summons was filed in MA because of the attorney but I made a mistake.

          The summons clearly states that it is from my state.

      • That Anonymous Dude says:

        For the MAD action? And you’re not in MA? I’m confused. If you’re NOT in MA, follow Raul’s advice, the court lacks personal jurisdiction. Then slap Ruggiero with a motion for Rule 11 sanctions.

        • Anonymous says:

          The summons was filed at the court of my jurisdiction by Ruggiero. I had assumed Ruggiero filed it in MA but I was mistaken.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s