California
- Malibu Media v. John Doe, CAND 15-cv-04152 (Recap) (Erlbaum, Ranallo)
Florida
- Malibu Media, Inc., v. Curt Van den Heuvel, FLMD 13-cv-01579 (Recap) (Lipscomb / Pro se, Douglas)
- Malibu Media v. Greg Weaver, FLMD 14-cv-01580 (Recap) (Lipscomb / Pro se, Conlin)
Illinois
- Malibu Media v. John Doe, ILND 13-cv-06312 (Recap) (Schulz, Nicoletti / Phillips, Russell)
- With surgical skill judge McNulty removes 96% from a demanded $100+K default judgement and discovers a terminal case of possible Malibu Media’s fraud on the federal judiciary (7/30/2016)
- Illinois Doe defendant summarily wins over Malibu Media in one of the most watched cases (2/8/2016)
- Week of 7/6/2014: news and updates from the Bittorent litigation front (7/13/2014)
- Malibu Media subpoenas Comcast for the “six strikes” data: why it is a big deal (6/29/2014)
- Mark your calendars: Malibu Media is set to defend its questionable conduct on July 30 (6/23/2014)
- Defense: Unlicensed German investigator Guardaley is steering US copyright trolling operations (6/1/2014)
- Battle with copyright troll Malibu Media is raging on in Maryland (5/18/2014)
- “Polygraph”report ricochet: Defendant moves to compel Lipscomb not to lie (4/16/2014)
- Defense attorney asks to sanction Malibu Media and Mary Schulz for unethical witness’ contingency interest (1/13/2014)
- Lipscomb & X-Art have a lot to hide. And a lot to fear (1/11/2014)
- Malibu Media v. Domingo Rodriguez, ILND 15-cv-03610 (Recap) (Schulz / Norman)
Indiana
- Malibu Media v. Tashiro, INSD 13-cv-00205 (Recap) (Nicoletti / Phillips, Russell)
- Why did Lipscomb cut and run from a seemingly slam dunk case? (8/23/2015)
- Indiana judge goes extra mile in striking down Malibu’s motion for sanctions and fees (4/15/2015)
- Malibu Media blackmail: deep in the Prenda territory (9/28/2014)
- Defendant reasonably refuses to trust copyright trolls, judge somewhat agrees (7/21/2014)
- Malibu Media subpoenas Comcast for the “six strikes” data: why it is a big deal (6/29/2014)
- Malibu Media’s “evidence” or the march of the Naked Emperor (5/21/2014)
- Defendant: Malibu Media’s expert Patrick Paige’s declaration is incompetent (3/30/2014)
Michigan
- Malibu Media v. Jesse Raleigh, MIWD 13-cv-00360 (Recap) (Nicoletti / Wilczynski, Herweyer)
- Malibu Media fails to find a new counsel, judge dismisses the case (5/23/2016)
- Blaming X-Art’s owners, Lipscomb wants to withdraw from Malibu Media representation in three cases (4/18/2016)
- Malibu Media drops the case after its expert found dozens of X-Art videos on defendant’s hard drive (4/1/2016)
- Week of 7/6/2014: news and updates from the Bittorent litigation front (7/13/2014)
- United States of America v. Paul Nicoletti, MIED 15-cr-20382 (Recap)
Minnesota
Nevada
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sequoia One, LLC, Aaron Kotzker et al, NVD 15-cv-01512 (Recap)
New York
- Malibu Media v. John Doe, NYSD 15-cv-02604 (Recap) (James / Sweet, Beckerman)
Ohio
- Malibu Media v. John Doe, OHSD 14-cv-00493 (Recap) (Faroniya / Bahgat, Sweet)
- Malibu Media v. David Ricupero, OHSD 14-cv-00821 (Recap, #27) (Faroniya / Sweet)
- Appellate brief filed in a Malibu Media case after the troll cuts and runs to avoid compensating wrongly accused (12/21/2016)
- Righting the wrongs: Malibu Media defendants appeal bad rulings (6/17/2016)
- Defendant opposes Malibu Media’s brazen attempt to cut and run without compensating wrongly accused (3/6/2016)
- Malibu Media’s obstruction of discovery prompts a powerful motion for default judgment (3/1/2016)
Gonna take a peek at MIWD 13-CV-360 when I get a chance. Looks like a Doe pro se is fighting the good fight and Judge Jonker is getting fed up with Nicoletti.
I’ll add it here tonight.
Not a Doe pro se but one who is nicely represented and who just filed a summary judgment motion. http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.miwd.73916/gov.uscourts.miwd.73916.74.0.pdf
The MIWD Malibu Media case just keeps getting worse for the troll:
“In summary, plaintiff has had the hard drives in its possession for 113 days, for an
examination that should apparently have required, at most, no more than two weeks. Plaintiff has
offered no persuasive reason why the examination has not been completed or a further status report filed, despite the fact that his expert had found time to work on other litigation, and plaintiff’s
counsel has had time to file 22 new cases in this court during that period.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to complete discovery
(docket no. 35) is DENIED.
Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to serve dispositive motions (docket no.
41) is contingent upon the previous motion for an extension of time, and is DENIED.” http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.miwd.73916/gov.uscourts.miwd.73916.77.0.pdf
This is now the defendant’s case to lose.
Malibu Media v. Greve, OHND 14-cv-02235 is resolved. Apparently a walk-away deal, or a low setllement. It’s not clear if Dahman’s strategy of arguing that Malibu can’t bring suits in Ohio worked.
Just going to drop this here for future reference as my memory is not what it once was. http://ia800305.us.archive.org/1/items/gov.uscourts.vaed.310538/gov.uscourts.vaed.310538.docket.html
Added this one. Powers is a powerful attorney.
A walkaway.
Going to also drop this here for future reference. http://ia600508.us.archive.org/3/items/gov.uscourts.mdd.258850/gov.uscourts.mdd.258850.docket.html The MTQ is interesting in that Techdirt, FCT and DTD all get mentioned in footnotes. Docket 49 is also worth a read.
Added.
A walkaway.
Another one. http://ia801502.us.archive.org/0/items/gov.uscourts.ohnd.214273/gov.uscourts.ohnd.214273.docket.html
Added this one.
Park it here (Randazza & Sperlein invoke the CA Anti-SLAPP law to shield a patent troll from extortion accusations) :http://ia601503.us.archive.org/8/items/gov.uscourts.cacd.621235/gov.uscourts.cacd.621235.docket.html