• Marvin Cable (CEG-TEK)
  • Daniel Goldsmith Ruggiero (Prenda)
  • John Young of Flynn|Wirkus|Young (Rightscorp)

Attorneys who defend troll victims

Relevant posts

wordpress visitor counter


415 responses to ‘Massachusetts

  1. Breaking Glass Pictures v. Swarm Sharing Hash File SHA1: A705C88ADACBD6B082C6800BEF09D4653AB6ECF1 et al so a new player on the scene????

    • Plaintiff: Breaking Glass Pictures
      Plaintiff Counsel: Alexandra Capachietti of Burns & Levinson LLP
      Defendant: Swarm Sharing Hash File A0AD891DA8DF4D87DDC343A3742DCF610FEE7B6D
      Does 1-5
      Hash is for direct to DVD B-movie”6 Degrees of Hell”
      Alexandra Capachietti is a former assistant DA for Essex county
      She needs a warning regarding what she’s getting into with these lawsuits; seems like she’s on the up and up but I’ll give her the benefit of the doubt she isn’t aware of the trolling scourge

  2. 3/28, Cable’s case that had been recommended for dismissal: MA CV 1:12-10532 was dismissed for failure to serve. Case has been Recapped.

    • Here’s the link to the Recap:

      At one point, there were other cases related to this one. I assume that they were all dismissed also. It’s not clear to me if that is the case.

      Associated Cases

      Related Cases Start Date End Date
      1:12-cv-10756-NMG Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1 – 38 04/30/2012
      1:12-cv-10757-DPW Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1 – 33 04/30/2012
      1:12-cv-10759-DPW Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1 – 30 04/30/2012
      1:12-cv-10758-GAO Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1 – 36 04/30/2012 03/28/2013

  3. Anyone have any idea what is going on with Cable’s cases. For instance, in case 1:12-cv-10804, Judge Saylor issued a motion which mentions the following:

    For the foregoing reasons, the claims against all of the “Doe” defendants are severed and
    all claims, except those against “Doe #1,” are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.

    Then Marvin dismisses Doe 1 without prejudice. Could someone explain?

    • It means that lawsuit is now dead but Cable could always file individual lawsuits against the same Does. However given the repeated benchslaps Cable has received the chances of him refilling are very, very slight.

    • Not an easy thing to answer in a single sentence – or a few paragraphs. I will first assume that you (or the ISP subscriber) got the settlement demand letter/email. What I would first do is make sure your network is secure and there is no BT activity continuing on it. Some Trolls will continue to monitor the IP addresses and use continuing activity to push harder for settlement or increasing settlement demands. I don’t know what Mr. Cable has been up to as far a cases. Make sure you read up on these types of cases, as well as what Mr. Cable has been up to. I don’t think he has been naming and serving individuals with summons/complaint – someone correct me if I’m wrong.

      DTD :)

      • He has Mac and said there’s nothing on there. Basically comcast sent an email warning. I called to find out why I violated FCC. Said someone ATTEMPTED to download a “particular” movie. It was a warning etc. I made sure nothing happened again and secured wifi etc. then we get this letter saying our prev deadline is over(didn’t know about a deadline). And now we have one week to pay. I just talked to him and he’s an a&&hole. By going on some paying website they retrieved tons of info on my son. He was vague on the phone when I asked what would he do if I didn’t pay😳👎

        • You ought to tell SJD (PRIVATELY – not in a comment here) which case this is associated with (it should say on the paperwork) – to see if it’s one where the judge squashed the subpoenas and told MC he better not contact any of the people whose info he got, without refiling against them individually. That has happened , to the best of my knowledge, to most of his cases in MA, and it would be very naughty of him to be disobeying judges orders so blatantly.

        • It sounds like you got a CEG Email and you called Marvin Cable to prove your innocence. You gave them your phone number by calling, so they were able to get your name. You need to be clear if you are sued in a current case or you responded to an email. Did you get a subpoena through your ISP? I don’t think Cable is suing many if any nowadays, but calling him was a bad idea.

    • I’m really surprised this scumbug was not trumped by superior lawpower yet: roaches are survivable…

      Call one of the lawyers listed on this page, they are all good and most (if not all) won’t mind talking to you for free.

  4. Thanks SJD for the recap and update- you’re the best

    looks like cable needs help with his mail merge software and general computer skills and might need to CHECK THE FUCKING DATES ON HIS SHIT

    “On September 25, 2012, this Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause…”
    “Date: September 18, 2012, Respectfully submitted,”

    lol what an inattentive oblivious toolbox, that response should be stricken due to unprecedented dumbfuckery and douchebagitude

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Pingbacks & Trackbacks