Prenda’s local Jacques Nazaire: Judge Wright’s order is irrelevant because… Anonymous attacked PayPal

Posted: May 22, 2013 by SJD in Prenda
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ah, Prenda’s local in Georgia, Jacques Nazaire… The amount of entertainment he provides should get him promoted to a lutz (at least) in Prenda’s ranks. I wrote about Nazaire’s delusional pleading a month ago; Popehat (among others) scoffed at Nazaire’s crazy argument that Wright’s order was irrelevant because Georgia did not endorse gay marriage…

Nazaire met (and somewhat exceeded) expectation this time: in his yet another attempt (in the AF Holdings, LLC v. Patel, GAND 12-cv-00262) to shield the judge from the damning truth — that Prenda, according to Judge Wright, is a bunch of fraudsters, tax evaders and identity thieves.

 

10. The undersigned does not know the answer to that question. However, it must be noted that defendants (not the one herein) in these types of cases, typically employ various crafty and intimidating schemes against prosecutors and plaintiff’s attorneys. A newspaper article mentioning other types of intimidation is attached hereto as Plaintiff’s Exhibit A.

11. Furthermore the undersigned has been personally harassed by these types of defendants (not the defendant in this instant case nor the individuals listed in Exhibit A) because of THIS case alone. (Please see Plaintiff’s Exhibit B attached hereto).

This is intriguing enough to jump to Pacer and download the exhibits. And what do we find?

Exhibit A: a newspaper article about Anonymous performing a DDoS attack on PayPal in 2010… Wow.

 

Exhibit B: a nasty, yet absolutely irrelevant email:

 

Well, the Prenda gang members are not new to using nasty emails sent to them for the purpose of moving judges to pity. Only this time the email contained a question, which Nazaire has perfectly answered himself by filing the Exhibit A.

Featured comment

Mysterious Anonymous on May 22, 2013 at 5:06 pm:

Let me get this straight.

He’s trying to argue that the fact that the firm he represents has been found to be defrauding the courts, committing ID theft, and has been catastrophically sanctioned for that behavior via monetary sanctions (that they are currently refusing to comply with) and criminal referrals to the USAO and IRS, is totally irrelevant to the case before the Georgia court.

And to support this argument (that the so-called irrelevant documents should not be filed), he files a couple of documents that, by his own admission, are totally irrelevant?

Now we know why this guy has to work for Prenda.

Update

5/24/2013

Defendant, through Blair Chintella, replied to Nazaire’s bizarre pleading. Translation from Legalese:

Exhibits A & B: WTF??

Also, Chintella tweeted that the sanction motion hearing is set to June 20, 2013.

Media coverage
Followup
Comments
  1. DieTrollDie says:

    The “Evilpiratemonkey’ was soooooooo crafty. Maybe he is cousin to the Evil Hate Monkey (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si0DcLvdyJw). Sad little Troll.

    DTD :)

  2. CTVic says:

    Nobody makes lawyerling look like hard work quite as well as a shitty ass lawyer.
    Nazaire makes it look HAAAAAARRRRRDDDDD

  3. Mysterious Anonymous says:

    Let me get this straight.

    He’s trying to argue that the fact that the firm he represents has been found to be defrauding the courts, committing ID theft, and has been catastrophically sanctioned for that behavior via monetary sanctions (that they are currently refusing to comply with) and criminal referrals to the USAO and IRS, is totally irrelevant to the case before the Georgia court.

    And to support this argument (that the so-called irrelevant documents should not be filed), he files a couple of documents that, by his own admission, are totally irrelevant?

    Now we know why this guy has to work for Prenda.

    • DB says:

      Yes, it’s irrelevant because the word ‘fraud’ might have a completely different meaning in California. We need to look at the details of th…

      !!!WOOKIE!!

  4. Raul says:

    Have to admit this is one of the Prenda lawsuits I have been trolling because you just knew Nazaire’s response was going to be off the wall, but have to agree with SJD, he did exceed expectations.

    The question is: Why is Prenda allowing this very obvious loose cannon to careen around the deck of their sinking ship?

    • indoemitable says:

      Insanity plea? Or planning to stall for time so XBiz can send off the S.S. Prenda to sail for territories not named the USA?

  5. indoemitable says:

    Fellas! Let’s give the guy a break. Trolling websites that allow you to post anonymously is hard, hard work. Nazaire can’t even get his thoughts together, never mind make a logical argument for the court.

  6. “Allowing this to continue will cause confusion and will lead to unnecessary billing fees. . . .” Um, Pot, meet Kettle.

  7. Everybody needs a good face-palm once in a while.

  8. […] Ah, Prenda’s local in Georgia, Jacques Nazaire… The amount of entertainment he provides should get him promoted to a lutz (at least) in Prenda’s ranks. I wrote about Nazaire’s delusional pleading a month ago; Popehat (among others) scoffed at Nazaire’s crazy argument that Wright’See all stories on this topic […]

  9. Anonymous says:

    You are all missing his point. One of the people in the article, or the person who sent the email, might be gay and live in a liberal state like Oregon. It makes perfect sense… to Nazaire… (Note to Nazaire this is sarcasm. Relax. Go read a good book – like The Crown: A Tale of Blood, Women and Wine.)

  10. Annon says:

    I’ve heard of the Chewbacca Defense, but is really trying to do a Chewbacca OFFENSE?

  11. Anonymous says:

    This is the guy who advertised on Craigslist, right? Craigslist has also run solicitations from, you know, people who want someone to dress up in a latex Richard Nixon mask and flog them or similar alternative pasttimes. Therefore, under Nazaire’s logic, his arguments must be irrelevant.

  12. juancarlosdeburbon says:

    Jacques Nazaire’s law school is now reassessing their admissions policy.

  13. that anonymous coward says:

    *stares at his nym*
    could it be I pushed him over the edge?

  14. SJD says:

    Blair Chintella (defense attorney on this case) tweeted:

    There’s going to be a hearing for the sanctions motions going on in Georgia on June 20th!

  15. […] that Judge Wrghts’s order is irrelevant because California allows gay marriage and because Anonymous attacked PayPal. It was the case where Mark Lutz claimed under oath that “Salt Marsh” is not an individual but […]

  16. […] famous order is irrelevant in Georgia because California recognizes gay marriage, and because Anonymous attacked PayPal. He called EFF “terrorists organization” and his “your momma” email to me prompted so many […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s