Judge Baer sounds the alarm: “copyright locusts have descended on the federal courts”

Posted: September 23, 2012 by Raul in Copyright Enforcement Group
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

By Raul

The locusts came up over all the land of Egypt and settled on the whole country of Egypt, such a dense swarm of locusts as had never been before, nor ever will be again. They covered the face of the whole land, so that the land was darkened, and they ate all the plants in the land and all the fruit of the trees that the hail had left. Not a green thing remained, neither tree nor plant of the field, through all the land of Egypt.
Exodus 10:12

Once again copyright troll Mike Meier has caused yet another Judge in the Southern District of New York to issue an Opinion and Order, dated 9/4/2012, condemning the copyright troll business model.


Federal Judge
Harold Baker Jr.

The judge in this case, is Judge Harold Baer, who was assigned three of Meier’s lawsuits: Media Products v. Does 1-26 (12-cv-3719), Media Products v. Does 1-40 (12-cv-3630) and Patrick Collins v. Does 1-4 (12-cv-2962). In the beginning of his order, Judge looks back to his initial decision to permit Meier expedited discovery in order to learn the personal identifying information of the Does by means of subpoenas to various ISPs. Even at that time the judge had concerns about these determinations. Accordingly (emphasis supplied in this and the subsequent quotes),

To satisfy my concerns, I provided a period of time during which Doe defendants would remain anonymous and could move to quash the subpoena or take other actions before their identifying information was turned over to Plaintiffs. Such protective orders have become commonplace in BitTorrent suits. My hope was that this would allow Plaintiffs to overcome the hurdle of the anonymity of infringement on the Internet while at the same time shielding Doe defendants from the coercive tactics employed by Plaintiffs. The relatively small group of lawyers who police copyright infringement on BitTorrent have customized the concept of extracting quick settlements without any intention of taking the case to trial.

The judge then embarks on a discussion of the difficult question of “whether the joinder of tens and sometimes hundreds or thousands of unnamed defendants in these cases is proper,” when it comes to the trolls’ swarm theory of joinder in BitTorrent lawsuits. While not deciding the issue, the Judge notes that

It is this swarm that Plaintiffs have relied on in grouping Doe defendants together in a common suit. Ironically, there are swarms on both sides, for copyright locusts have descended on the federal courts, exacting low-cost settlements from embarrassed John Does and then moving on to the next District.

In footnote 2, which accompanies this quote, the judge ponders the waste of judicial resources caused by copyright troll lawsuits:

[i]t is difficult to even imagine the extraordinary amount of time federal judges have spent on these cases.

Judge Baer seemingly takes his cue from Judge Wright, who asserted that the courts are not “cogs in a plaintiffs copyright-enforcement business model. The Court will not idly watch what is essentially an extortion scheme, for a case that [Plaintiffs have] no intention of bringing to trial.” Joining with Judge Marrero, Baer orders the severance and dismissal without prejudice of all Does except the Doe 1. The judge is

also troubled by the fact that some Doe defendants have already been voluntarily dismissed at this early stage in the litigation; it suggests as suspected that the pressure on Doe defendants to settle their case quickly and thereby avoid embarrassment and litigation costs — when they may not even have committed any infringement — is all too real.

According to Judge Baer, this unfair pressure tactic employed by the trolls,

if left unchecked, could turn copyright protection on its head. Congress intended to incentivize the creation of useful arts by providing a statutory right and a means of enforcement that would reward authors for their labors, hardly the Plaintiffs’ strategy here. [...] In the BitTorrent pornography cases, settlements are for notoriously low amounts relative to the possible statutory damages, but high relative to the low value of the work and minimal costs of mass litigation. Cases are almost never prosecuted beyond sending demand letters and threatening phone calls.

Of final interest is one portion of Judge Baer’s order, which warns Troll Meier as follows:

…that Plaintiffs shall not contact any Doe defendant who does not remain in this or a subsequently-filed case, and any pending settlement not with John Doe 1 in each named case shall immediately cease. If after 14 days Plaintiffs have not reinstituted cases against the remaining Doe defendants, Plaintiffs shall destroy whatever personal information they presently have for those defendants and shall not use the information for any purpose. If any Doe defendant no longer named in a case is contacted following entry of this Order, I encourage them to contact the Court.

Below is the entire Order and Opinion:

 

In closing, I wish to thank Ray Beckerman, Esq., who was the first to point to this fine Opinion and Order as well as Mike Meier for, once again, increasing the federal judiciary’s arsenal to hinder this wasteful and predatory abuse of the federal courts.

Of course, the obvious music video to embed would be Bob Marley’s “Exodus” but I think this one is more apt:

 

Media Coverage

9/24/2012 Techdirt: Another Judge Blasts Copyright Trolls by Mike Masnick.

Comments
  1. Irritated Troll Hater says:

    Meier was stupid enough to back into SDNY, he gets what he deserves. Trolls will never learn. Kudos to judge Baer for not giving in and slapping Meier. Great article Raul!

    Down with all Trolls

  2. Raul says:

    My German is somewhat rusty but I think “Mike Meier” = “Fucking Clown”. Good Morning!

  3. Raul says:

    SJD, welcome back and thanks for tidying up my ramblings, once again!

    • that anonymous coward says:

      No no rambling is my thing…

      The only think that would make this better was if the Judge had finally asked for the experts to prove their expertise and face the cold truth the technique is flawed.

      • Skruuball says:

        God, I wish somebody would make them do that.

        I’ll bet they would produce some fat German dude to spit out random acronyms in the hope of sounding technical.

        • that anonymous coward says:

          Well and that opens to the door to the lawsuits in Germany against Gaurdaley (sp) by former partner lawfirms who were never told about the error rate, and the court throwing Gaurdaley (sp) out of court.

  4. Subscribe says:

    Subscribe

  5. The Tod says:

    This order will be a good one to foward to judges chambers for all of Meiers other lawsuits.

    Well done Raul!!

  6. [...] The latest is from Judge Harold Baer in the Southern District of New York, who you could say is not impressed by some copyright trolling cases that have ended up in his court, coming from Media Products and Patrick Collins. He had allowed for expedited discovery, which is [...]

  7. Raul says:

    Before this post gets eclipsed by the H-Bomb SJD is preparing, rhetorical question: if the year was 1774 do you think fellow trolls would tar & feather Meier? I do.

    • That Anonymous Dude says:

      If this were 1774, I doubt trolls would even exist because they’d be too afraid of angry mobs with rope.

  8. Raul says:

    On 9-20 Troll Meier drops 12-cv-3719 because (surprise, surprise!) Doe 1 cannot be located http://ia600401.us.archive.org/19/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.396430/gov.uscourts.nysd.396430.10.0.pdf The status conference for 12-cv-2962 and 12-cv-3620 has been kicked to 10-11 and wanna bet those Doe 1s will be likewise not located or outside court’s jurisdiction? Meier is such an empty suit (pun intended).

  9. [...] To satisfy my concerns, I provided a period of time during which Doe defendants would remain anonymous and could move to quash the subpoena or take other actions before their identifying information was turned over to Plaintiffs. Such protective orders have become commonplace in BitTorrent suits. My hope was that this would allow Plaintiffs to overcome the hurdle of the anonymity of infringement on the Internet while at the same time shielding Doe defendants from the coercive tactics employed by Plaintiffs. The relatively small group of lawyers who police copyright infringement on BitTorrent have customized the concept of extracting quick settlements without any intention of taking the case to trial.Source: fightcopyrighttrolls.com [...]

  10. [...] Judge Baer sounds the alarm: “copyright locusts have descended on the federal courts” [...]

  11. [...] declared “essentially an extortion scheme.” Indeed these copyright troll attorneys have been judicially compared to predatory [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s